FUNPRESP-EXE: vantagens e desvantagens na adesão do servidor público

Abstract

This article presents the concepts of Social Previdence, compulsory contributions and the expectation of benefits in retirement, taking into account the current legislation at the admission in federal public services. It also shows the concepts of Complementary Previdence (open and closed), investments, risk and return, especially, in order to guide the server to the possibilities of investments in Complementary Previdence. The dissertation aims to compare investments in FUNPRESP or open Complementary Previdence Entities, describing advantages and disadvantages, to the federal public worker, in the role of Alternative Active Participant on the investment in FUNPRESP. In order to achieve such goal, the article presents the following chapters: Social Previdence, the General Social Previdence Regime, as well as the Proper Social Previdence Regime. After such explanation, it was introduced the theme Complementary Previdence distinguishing Closed Complementary Previdence Entity - EFPC (FUNPRESP) from Open Complementary Previdence Entities - EAPC. To carry on the research, the procedure used for collecting data was document research. Document research aimed to analyze the information provided on internet websites as the expectations of Plan Rentability, background and some simulations have been performed. By the end, it is been verified that the investment in FUNPRESP presents advantagens and disadvantages in relation to some investiments in EAPC, depending on the profile of the worker that will perform that investment. The high percentage of performance rate (7%) is a disadvantage compared to other Previdence Plans, but the administration rate of 0% is one of the advantages of FUNPRESP. Therefore, FUNPRESP isn't the best investment alternative in all cases. To servers that will contribute for longer periods, FUNPRESP seems better than to servers that tend to contribute for shorter time.